The Receipts
Every construction tech vendor claims AI. Few show what that means.
We're showing our work because that should be the standard.
Every construction tech vendor claims AI. Few show what that means.
We're showing our work because that should be the standard.
— Every pitch deck, ever
— You, hopefully
You evaluate trade partners based on track record. You check references. You look at past projects. You don't hand a $50M mechanical package to a sub who shows up with a nice pitch deck and promises.
Software should work the same way.
The variance tells you where AI is ready to trust — and where human review is still required.
Each task sounds straightforward. In practice, construction documents are messy. Specs contradict drawings. Addenda override base documents. Equipment schedules use different naming conventions from page to page.
That's why we measure on real project data.
Receipts > promises
When we tell you our equipment extraction runs at 95% accuracy, we can show you the executions.
When we tell you we've processed tens of thousands of specifications, we can show you the data.
That's the difference between a claim and a commitment.
As models improve and we expand into new workflows, we'll publish performance on those too. Construction runs on trust. Trust is built through transparency.
Upload your specs. See the extractions. Judge the accuracy yourself.
Get StartedData reflects production workloads from the past quarter. Accuracy measured via semantic evaluation against human-verified ground truth. We'd rather show you the honest picture than pretend everything is solved.